Bankruptcy

Reaffirmation Agreements: The Silent Way Creditors Hurt Your Credit After a Chapter 7 Discharge

The following discussion examines Reaffirmation Agreements and how it affects credit reporting obligations under federal law. I provide an expert-level breakdown of creditor policies and debtor options.

By Alexander Hernandez, J.D., Professor, and Author of Consumer Bankruptcy Law (Routledge).

Updated on November 4, 2025.

Listen: The Professor’s Audio Briefing.

Key Takeaways with Reaffirmation Agreements:

  • Reaffirmation Agreements are voluntary contracts used in Chapter 7 bankruptcy when a debtor wants to keep secured assets (like a car or house) and agrees to remain personally liable for the debt.
  • Creditors commonly stop reporting payments on a secured debt to credit bureaus if a valid reaffirmation agreement was not signed, often citing compliance concerns with federal law, including the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).
  • If creditors don’t report timely payments on secured debt in the absence of reaffirmation agreements, this prevents debtors from rebuilding their credit.

The Post-Bankruptcy Discharge Credit Dilemma

Imagine faithfully making every car or mortgage payment for years after your Chapter 7 bankruptcy, only to find these on-time payments aren’t being reported to credit bureaus. This absence of positive payment history can significantly impede your credit score recovery.

Why does this common and frustrating scenario occur? The answer often lies in the controversial Reaffirmation Agreement.

What is a Reaffirmation Agreement?

In Chapter 7 bankruptcy, a debtor must state their intention regarding secured assets. If the debtor wishes to keep the asset (the house or car), they must decide between redeeming the property (paying its value in a lump sum), or reaffirming the debt.

When a debtor is discharged from personal liability on a secured debt where the asset was surrendered, the debtor’s personal obligation to pay the debt is eliminated. The creditor can no longer pursue the debtor for repayment or for a deficiency balance if the property is later taken and sold.

However, if a reaffirmation agreement was signed, the debtor voluntarily reinstated personal liability. If the debtor later defaults, the creditor retains the right to pursue collection of the entire remaining loan balance. This loss is referred to as the deficiency balance.

For example, if a loan balance on a car is $15,000, and the car is repossessed and sold at auction for $10,000, the debtor is responsible for the $5,000 deficiency only if the reaffirmation was signed.

The Impact of the BAPCPA (2005) on Secured Debt

BAPCPA effectively ended the ride-through option in most jurisdictions. BAPCPA required that debtors formally choose one of the three options (reaffirmation, redemption, or surrender). This change significantly strengthened the creditor’s position, as the primary incentive for the debtor to sign the reaffirmation agreement was to have a positive payment history reflected on their credit report.

When a creditor refuses to report post-discharge payments due to a lack of a reaffirmation agreement, the debtor is faced with a difficult choice:

  1. Refinance the Secured Debt: The most effective and reliable solution is often to refinance the car or mortgage with a new lender. Since the refinanced loan is a new contract created after the bankruptcy filing, it is entirely separate from the discharged debt. The payments on this new, refinanced debt will be reported accurately, immediately beginning the process of building a positive credit history.

The Professor’s Take on Reaffirmation Agreements

The decision of whether to sign a reaffirmation agreement involves a careful risk/reward analysis. While signing one ensures credit reporting, it also reintroduces personal liability for a potential deficiency balance if the asset is later repossessed or foreclosed upon. The alternative, avoiding reaffirmation to escape deficiency liability, comes at the cost of slower credit rebuilding.

Professor Hernandez is an attorney specializing in consumer finance and debt relief. He is the published author of Consumer Bankruptcy Law (Routledge Publishing) and teaches law and finance courses in both English and Spanish for an international university.

You can find additional categories by clicking below or by using the search feature at the top of this page:

Please note that the information on this site does not constitute legal advice and should be considered for informational purposes only.

Updates:

  • March 19, 2025.
  • September 9, 2025.

Discover more from Bankruptcy.Blog

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.