The Legal and Financial Reality of Restructuring the Department of Education

Discussions about dismantling or radically restructuring the U.S. Department of Education often ignore the statutory, administrative, and financial realities that make such proposals far more complex than political rhetoric suggests.

While executive authority can redirect priorities, pause programs, or reorganize internal divisions, the Department of Education (ED) itself is a cabinet‑level agency created by Congress. Eliminating it requires congressional action.

Yet the federal student loan system is undergoing structural change. These shifts affect repayment plans, loan servicing, and, critically, the enforcement of defaulted student loans, specifically the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Understanding these developments is essential for student loan borrowers.

Updated on July 24, 2026.

By Alexander Hernandez, J.D., Professor, and Author of Consumer Bankruptcy Law (Routledge).

🎧 Listen to this Article. Prefer to listen on the go? Stream this article.

Key Takeaways:

• Congressional Approval Required: Dissolving the U.S. Department of Education cannot be achieved through an Executive Order; it is a cabinet-level agency established by statute that requires explicit congressional action to eliminate.
• Debt Obligations Remain Intact: Dismantling or fragmenting the agency would not erase the country’s $1.86+ trillion student loan portfolio. Administrative responsibilities and enforcement would simply shift to other federal offices, primarily the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
• The Dissolution of the SAVE Plan: Following federal litigation and court orders terminating the SAVE Plan, borrowers must transition to alternative income-driven repayment (IDR) plans or face automatic reassignment to higher-payment structures.
• Proactive Servicer Management: Borrowers must log into their Federal Student Aid (FSA) accounts, confirm their designated servicer, and submit new IDR applications early to avoid delays, and maintain a meticulous paper trail of all communications.
• Aggressive Treasury Enforcement: The U.S. Department of the Treasury has non-judicial collection tools that bypass traditional courts, including the Treasury Offset Program (TOP) and Administrative Wage Garnishment (AWG) without a court order.
• Household Budget Squeeze: Rising student loan payments compounded by inflation, trade policies, and elevated living costs require households to immediately reassess their debt-to-income ratios and household budgets.

Statutory Constraints on Restructuring the Department of Education

Proposals to abolish or significantly downsize the Department of Education encounter immediate statutory barriers. Executive orders cannot erase an agency created by statute. Even if administrative actions reduce staff, consolidate offices, or transfer certain functions to other federal entities, the underlying legal obligations remain.

Recent data from the Education Data Initiative concludes that student loan debt exceeds $1.86 trillion. These loans must still be serviced, tracked, and enforced. Dissolving or fragmenting the Department of Education will not eliminate federal student loan debt. Instead, responsibilities would be redistributed across other agencies, most notably the Department of the Treasury, which already plays a central role in federal debt collection.

The Status of Income‑Driven Repayment Plans After SAVE

The landscape of income‑driven repayment (IDR) changed sharply following the federal litigation that resulted in the termination of the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) Plan. Multiple state challenges resulted in a federal court order formally dissolving the program, triggering a nationwide transition process for millions of borrowers.

As of July 1st, loan servicers initiated formal transition procedures requiring borrowers previously enrolled in SAVE to select a new repayment plan. For those that failed to act within the required time period face automatic reassignment to less favorable repayment structures.

The removal of SAVE eliminates one of the most generous affordability‑based repayment plans ever implemented, leaving borrowers with fewer income‑sensitive options and increasing pressure on household liquidity. Increased risk of delinquency or default

For households already operating with tight budgets, these changes can materially affect liquidity and long‑term financial stability.

Steps Borrowers Should Take Immediately

To avoid the trap of automatic reassignment and higher monthly payments following the dissolution of the SAVE Plan, borrowers must take proactive control of their repayment strategy rather than waiting for servicers to act.

The first critical step is confirming your designated loan servicer by logging directly into your Federal Student Aid (FSA) account to identify who currently holds your portfolio. Next, borrowers need to evaluate the remaining income-driven repayment options, as each alternative handles discretionary income calculations and forgiveness timelines.

To mitigate processing backlogs and prevent a temporary assignment to a higher-payment standard plan, applications for a new IDR plan should be submitted as soon as possible.

During this process, ensure that income and family-size information is current. In addition, student loan servicers are notoriously disorganized, so keep a meticulous paper trail, including copies of all notices, application submissions, and servicer correspondence, including screenshots of your payment history.

The Expanding Enforcement Role of the U.S. Department of the Treasury

A critical but often overlooked component of federal student loan administration is the enforcement authority exercised by the U.S. Department of the Treasury when it comes to debt collection.

When dealing with delinquent federal debt like student loans, the U.S. Department of the Treasury is powerful and has non-judicial collection tools that bypass traditional court systems. Chief among these is the Treasury Offset Program (TOP), which actively intercepts federal tax refunds, Social Security benefits, and other government payments to satisfy outstanding federal obligations.

Additionally, the Treasury utilizes Administrative Wage Garnishment (AWG), allowing agencies to garnish a debtor’s wages without needing to secure a court order first. With a private debt collector, reaching the level of wage garnishment is a lengthy process.

Preparing Your Household Budget

When monthly student loan payments rise at the same time everyday costs keep climbing, household finances tighten quickly. Higher payments, combined with inflation, shifting trade conditions, and increased living expenses, leave families with less disposable income to work with.

For borrowers on strict budgets, this pressure means they must immediately reassess their financial picture. That includes reviewing their debt‑to‑income ratio, examining how each dollar of monthly cash flow is divided between essential and discretionary spending, and adjusting long‑term plans to reflect increased budgets.

Households that cannot absorb the higher payments may need to evaluate whether bankruptcy options are appropriate before missed payments and arrears begin to escalate.

Conclusion

The federal student loan system is not disappearing, even if political rhetoric suggests otherwise. The Department of Education cannot be abolished without congressional action, and even structural downsizing would merely shift responsibilities, not eliminate them.

With SAVE terminated, borrowers face higher payments and fewer flexible repayment options. At the same time, the Department of the Treasury’s enforcement authority continues to expand, making federal collection more aggressive and more centralized.

For borrowers, understanding these institutional shifts is essential. The legal and financial realities of federal student loan administration are evolving, but the obligations themselves remain firmly intact.

Educational Resources

• For Institutions: Colleges and universities may request examination copies of my textbook directly from Routledge Publishing.
• For Students & Practitioners: Single print and digital copies are available via Amazon Books.
• Video Lectures: Stream comprehensive legal breakdowns and video explanations on the Bankruptcy.blog YouTube Channel.

Bankruptcy Court & Consumer Resources

Explore additional consumer guides and state-specific directories to navigate your legal options:

• A step-by-step master guide to completing and understanding the bankruptcy petition.
• Bankruptcy Court Directory: Full listings for the federal bankruptcy court system and trustee contact information.
• State Bankruptcy Exemptions: Review your state‑specific exemptions or compare them with the federal exemptions.
• 341 Meeting Procedures: Prepare for your court date with updated rules, expectations, and practical guidance.

Please note that the information on this site does not constitute legal advice and should be considered for informational purposes only.